Login


Wolfe Publishing Group
    Menu

    Cartridge Board

    6.5x52mm Carcano

    The tremendous increase in gun ownership seen in the U.S. over the past 20 years is certainly welcome news for our hobby. It has not, however, been accidental. Two indisputable facts are responsible: One, increasing drug-related violence and property crimes that law enforcement is not allowed to do much about; two, the now almost country-wide availability of concealed-carry permits. Countless Americans are purchasing firearms for home, family and personal protection. In doing so, many people have been exposed to shooting and how much fun it can be. New shooters are pushing much of today’s action rifle and pistol competition.

    Cartridges shown include a (1) smokeless 8mm Lebel, (2) 7.92x57mm Mauser, (3) 7.65mm Belgian, (4) .303 British and a (5) 6.5x52mm Carcano.
    Cartridges shown include a (1) smokeless 8mm Lebel, (2) 7.92x57mm Mauser, (3) 7.65mm Belgian, (4) .303 British and a (5) 6.5x52mm Carcano.
    One new example is shooting old, original military rifles at targets compatible with their iron sights. This is great fun, especially when firing at knock-down targets. Our subject cartridge this time fits perfectly with its military rifle for such shooting. It is the 6.5x52mm Carcano, aka the 6.5x52.5mm, 6.5 Carcano and 6.5 Italian. As Italy’s rifle and machine-gun cartridge from the dawn of smokeless powder to the end of World War II, both it and the Model 1891 rifle were perhaps not perfect, but certainly adequate.

    Origin of the 6.5 Carcano began with the announcement of the first commercial smokeless powder compound, known as Poudre B, by French inventor Paul Vieille in 1886. All black-powder military rifles were instantly made obsolete. Within a few short years, France, Germany, Belgium and Great Britain had new small-caliber, smokeless-powder military rounds. Italy wanted to join them.

    These cartridges include a (1) 6.5 Carcano, (2) 6.5 Arisaka, (3) 6.5x54 Mannlicher, (4) 6.5x53R, (5) 6.5x55 Swedish and a (6) .260 Remington.
    These cartridges include a (1) 6.5 Carcano, (2) 6.5 Arisaka, (3) 6.5x54 Mannlicher, (4) 6.5x53R, (5) 6.5x55 Swedish and a (6) .260 Remington.
    In 1888 Italy’s Ministry of War assigned a Small Arms Commission to determine the proper caliber for a new smokeless-powder military round. The winner was the 6.5mm (.256 inch). Bullets, however, had to weigh 161 grains and were used with gain-twist rifling; twist at the breech was specified to be one turn in 60cm (23.6 inches) increasing to 20cm (7.9 inches) at the muzzle. A
    In 1907 a strange, three-point stab crimp was placed on the case neck (left) of the 6.5 Carcano. It became a standard case mouth crimp (right) before World War II.
    In 1907 a strange, three-point stab crimp was placed on the case neck (left) of the 6.5 Carcano. It became a standard case mouth crimp (right) before World War II.
    rimmed cartridge was used initially, but a rimless case was demanded for the final design.

    Now we encounter some strange happenings. It is known that Italy approved the 6.5mm in April 1890. I cannot find a date for the rimless case design, but since the ammunition is labeled M91 (1891), it must have been designed quickly. Some say this was original work, yet I doubt it. Consider that the M91 Carcano rifle used a Mannlicher clip loading system for which Italy paid a royalty of 300,000 lire. Then Mannlicher sold Romania its M1892 military rifle that fired a rimmed 6.5mm cartridge, and its case had the same .450-inch base diameter as the .303 British – it was formed from .303 cases! The Netherlands bought essentially the same rifle chambering and the same cartridge; today it is called the 6.5x53R Mannlicher. I would bet this was the rimmed case Italy used in its initial testing.

    Italy’s wise decision to use a rimless case for better feeding in automatic arms resulted in an exact rimless copy of the 6.5x53R, except for a slightly shorter neck. This is the 6.5x52 Carcano. Greece later purchased its M1903 Mannlicher rifle chambered for what was called the 6.5x54 Mannlicher – simply a 6.5 Carcano lengthened to the same length as the 6.5x53R! It seems more than likely that Mannlicher (like Mauser) had to have cartridges to fire in his military rifles if he hoped to sell them. Smaller calibers and lighter bullets

    In 1895 a deep groove (left) was formed in the case head while commercial cartridges have no groove.
    In 1895 a deep groove (left) was formed in the case head while commercial cartridges have no groove.
    seemed logical for Mannlicher to develop since Mauser was using 7.65 to 8mm rounds. After all, this was long before airplanes or military vehicles of any type. Troops walked into battle, artillery and supplies were moved by horses. Putting a hole in a soldier meant he stopped walking or driving horses; a hole in a horse meant it stopped pulling; it was not rocket science. A 6.5mm roundnose bullet was adequate.

    Italy did, however, have a few ideas of its own. One was a wide, deep groove formed in the rear of the case head. It was added four years after production began. Some enthusiasts say it was to save a bit of valuable brass. Others insist it was to prevent a fired primer from backing out when the round was used in automatic weapons. The latter is not possible because the groove was formed when the case was drawn and before the primer was

    Base diameter of the 6.5 Carcano is about .020 inch smaller than the 7.92x57 Mauser and .270 Winchester.
    Base diameter of the 6.5 Carcano is about .020 inch smaller than the 7.92x57 Mauser and .270 Winchester.
    seated. Cartridges in my collection, however, seem to show the very top of the inside wall of the groove to be pushed in toward the primer ever so slightly. This could lock the primer in if done after seating. Whether in my imagination or not, there were far simpler ways of doing this available at the time.

    Another unique feature was a raised ledge formed at the inside bottom of the case neck. The purpose was to prevent the bullet from being pushed farther into the case when subjected to the violent feeding cycle of machine guns.

    Original 6.5 Carcano loads used a 10.45-gram (161-grain, .267-inch diameter) jacketed roundnose bullet. This bullet was made by dropping flux into the jacket, adding a lead core then heating the jacket to melt the lead, fusing it to the jacket before finish-forming the bullet. Bonded core bullets are not a modern development! Propellant consisted of 30.1 grains of Number 1 Ballistite, a powder licensed from Dynamit Nobel. Muzzle velocity is given as 2,297 fps from a 30.7-inch barrel or 2,130 fps from later 18-inch carbine models.

    A few modifications were made to ammunition as time passed. In 1906 a change in powder to Solenite (very close to British Cordite) gave lower breech pressure. At the same time a strange trapezoidal-shaped stab crimp was placed at three points around the case neck. This became a conventional rolled crimp just before WWII. Beginning in 1940 the cupro-nickel bullet

    jacket was replaced by plated steel, and steel cartridge cases were produced in limited numbers. Recent tests on old surplus ammunition indicate pressures in the 38,000 to 40,000 psi range. No change in bullet weight or velocity was ever made.

    One might think handloading the 6.5 Carcano would be simple, yet that is not the case. Rifles have standard 6.5mm (.256 inch) bores, yet groove depth runs .268 inch to fire the .267-inch military bullets. Standard 6.5mm bullets today are .264 inch diameter, so accuracy varies. Hornady listed a 160-grain RN .267-inch bullet especially for the Carcano until at least 2013, but it is gone today. Norma USA offers a factory load pushing a 156-grain Alaska softpoint to 2,330 fps, and the company offers empty cases. I believe Prvi Partizan also listed empty cases recently. Proper steel jacketed bullets are sometimes seen, presumably pulled from old surplus rounds.

    Accuracy of the 6.5 Carcano is often criticized, but I have some experience here, having bought one in 1962 at the military surplus store in Clinton, Iowa. Price was a few cents over $10 for a rifle and all the surplus ammunition I could carry to the truck in one trip! The bore was quite good. Exterior condition of the rifle can only be described as “battlefield abandoned,” yet it would keep all its bullets in a 12-inch circle at 200 yards and almost all at 300 yards using factory sights that are really, really crude. Nevertheless, with proper ammunition it would be fun on tip-over targets today, and it was a whole lot more pleasant to fire than my dad’s teeth-rattling ’03 Springfield!


    Wolfe Publishing Group